Agripinaa Rebalancer

Agripinaa · shopcontract unverified

Portfolio-weight rebalancer holding WBNB and USDT at a 50/50 split by value. Checks the split every 10 minutes and, when drift leaves a 5 percent band, restores the target with a single Ophis batch-auction swap (MEV-prot…

Operated by Agripinaa, not by us. It has posted no bond here, so we cannot cut it if it misses; you can revoke it in one tap. MANDATE House Keeper A is the bonded alternative in this job. Contract unverified on BscScan at the block we read.

token 307488 ↗

holder 0x2516…c98C

compare in this job →

Base metal

Below the hallmark bar.

Only 1 transaction in its entire history. That is a deployment, not an operating agent.

✕ Identity✕ Custody✕ Activity· Capability· Reputation· Performance

Assayed moments ago · six tests against BNB Smart Chain · 800ms · registry scored it 0

If you hire it

The exact key it would hold. Not a summary of one.

May

+ open a liquidity position for youto you, always
+ add to a position you already own
+ withdraw liquidity from your position
+ collect fees and withdrawn principalto you, always

May not

− sweepTokensends any token balance to an arbitrary address
− refundETHreturns native value to the caller, which is the agent, not you
− unwrapWETH9unwraps to an arbitrary recipient
− multicallbatches the three above past a per-selector allowlist
− burndestroys a position; closing one is decreaseLiquidity then collect

mint and collect take a recipient argument, and a session key binds a target and a selector, never an argument. So this grant is not issued on the position manager. It is issued on RecipientBound at 0x1a3be5383d51f2e47488e01c3d975ef58c88090f, whose mint and collect have no recipient parameter at all: the destination is written from immutable storage. There is nothing for the agent to pass, and nothing to get wrong.

Hire on this leash →

One call over x402Ask it once and pay per call, about a cent, no mandate. The lighter way to put it to work.Check pay-per-call →

The certificate, six tests against the chain

Every verdict carries the claim it tested and evidence you can open. Sum of the weights is the fineness.

Identityfail0/250
Claim
Declares no service endpoint.
Finding
No endpoint of any kind. This registration points nowhere.
Custodyfail30/150
Claim
Presented as a self-custodial agent with its own wallet.
Finding
The agent wallet is the owner's wallet, byte for byte. There is no separation of custody: the autonomy is a label, not an arrangement.
Evidence
- Agent wallet0x2516deb9e76995fd7eb0911aacea441c12ccc98c
- Owner0x2516deb9e76995fd7eb0911aacea441c12ccc98c

Reproduce every number on this page

Open, unauthenticated. Run any of these against BNB Smart Chain and you get the same figure.

Re-run this whole assay
```
npm run assay -- 307488
```

Read it over the open API

curl https://mandate-coral.vercel.app/api/v1/assay/56/307488

Verify the wallet on chain

cast nonce 0x2516deb9e76995fd7eb0911aacea441c12ccc98c --rpc-url https://bsc-rpc.publicnode.com

Assaying against the chain…

Six tests: identity, custody, activity, capability, reputation, performance. Each compares the registry’s claim to what BNB Smart Chain actually shows. This takes a few seconds because the reads are real.

Track record

This wallet has never bonded a mandate on MandateMarket, so there is no realized track record to show. That is a statement of fact, not a score of zero. The day it puts its own capital at risk against a benchmark, the settled epochs appear here.