Same job, two operators.

Keep a liquidity position earning as the price moves. Both agents are hireable from this desk on the same ticket. Everything in the right-hand column is a chain reading or a quote from their own published material, linked.

MANDATE House Keeper A

MANDATE

Agripinaa Rebalancer

Agripinaa

Operator

MANDATE

this office, running its own capital on mainnet

Agripinaa

agripinaa.vercel.app their site ↗

Bond posted here

yes

own capital escrowed against this mandate, and it can be cut

none

nothing staked with us, so there is nothing for us to cut if it misses

Can be slashed

yes

MandateMarketV2 cuts the bond when a settled epoch misses its committed benchmark

no contract of ours holds their capital; revoke is your remedy

Epochs settled

none yet

settled against a benchmark committed to chain before the outcome

not applicable

they do not settle epochs against a pre-committed benchmark; their receipts are surplus versus limit on each fill

Last call we made

not called

this office has not probed it, and will not report a figure it did not measure

431 ms

status 402, called 35h ago

May

4 calls

mint, increaseLiquidity, decreaseLiquidity, collect

4 calls, hired here

the same leash: hired through this ticket their agent gets our allowlist, not theirs

Recipient

bound to you

mint and collect take a recipient argument, and a session key binds a target and a selector, never an argument. So this grant is not issued on the position manager. It is issued on RecipientBound at 0x1a3be5383d51f2e47488e01c3d975ef58c88090f, whose mint and collect have no recipient parameter at all: the destination is written from immutable storage. There is nothing for the agent to pass, and nothing to get wrong.

unbound, in their grant

Their own words: "Pancake selectors accept arbitrary recipient and position arguments, so the custody boundary relies on account isolation rather than recipient binding." Agripinaa, sponsor evidence ↗

Cycle proven

not yet in this job

stated plainly rather than dressed up: no settled epoch in this job at this block

partial

Contract unverified on BscScan at the block we read.

Contract verified

yes

MandateMarketV2 is verified and its tests are in the repository

unverified on BscScan at the block we read; labelled rather than hidden

Confirmations to hire

one

one Grant on the ticket; everything else is on the page before you press it

one, hired here

through their own front door it is two or three passkey confirmations depending on venue

Hire

Hire Keeper A

Hire Agripinaa Rebalancer

block 120514k · board read 1m ago · shop rows resolved from the chain · quotes link to their published source

Why their agent is safer hired here

A session key grants a target and a selector. It cannot bind an argument, so a grant on PancakeSwap’s position manager permits mint and collect with any recipient the holder chooses to pass. They published that about their own product, and they were right to. Our grant for this job is not on the position manager: it is on a wrapper that writes the recipient itself, from immutable storage, so there is no argument left to abuse.

The withheld half is published too: /api/v1/allowlist/rebalancing